These four beasts parallel Nebuchadnezzar’s statue in Daniel 2, which was divided into four parts—each of which representing a specific nation. Daniel 2:38 identifies the first nation to comprise this statue, as Daniel says to Nebuchadnezzar, “You, O king, the king of kings, to whom the God of heaven has given the kingdom, the power, and the might, and the glory, and into whose hand he has given, wherever they dwell, the children of man, the beasts of the field, and the birds of the heavens, making you rule over them all—you are the head of gold.” Thus, to identify the four beasts, one must look at the chronological succession of empires after Babylon. Through the head, which represents Babylon, it is evident that the chest and arms represent the Medo-Persians, the body and thighs represent the Hellenes, and the legs represent Rome.

In addition, Daniel 2:34-35 states, “As you looked, a stone was cut out by no human hand, and it struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces. Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold, all together were broken in pieces, and became like the chaff of the summer threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, so that not a trace of them could be found. But the stone that struck the image became a great mountain and filled the whole earth.” The heavenly stone that destroys this statue represents the coming of Christ and His kingdom (Christendom), which would conquer each of the Four Beasts and expand across the entirety of the Earth. 

Through these passages, we can know with certainty that the Saints of the Most High would inherit the Four Beast Empires and rule them forever (Daniel 7:17-18). Keep in mind that Iraq, Iran, Greece and the Balkans are represented in the 1st-3rd beasts (Babylon, Medo-Persia, Macedon/Hellenes), while Italy is represented in the 4th beast (Rome). Thus, Eastern Orthodoxy is the product of the 1st-3rd beasts’ decimation, whereas Roman Catholicism is the product of the 4th beasts decimation.

Accordingly, if venerating images of Saints and Angels deems Catholic and Orthodox Christians “non-Christians” or “fake Christians”, and being a “non-Christian” or “fake Christian” means you aren’t a legitimate Saint, then that requires those who slander historical denominations to believe that Daniel was a liar. Another implication is that proponents of this assertion are required to believe that there had not been a “true Christian” from the early Church until the 1500’s—the underlying inference being that Christ’s Church was failed from the start.

Conclusively, not one rebuttal against the use of icons and statues is valid, and the presence of images in a Church does not render that congregation illegitimate. The “Saints of the Most High” have been implementing artistic depictions into their Churches since the 2nd-3rd centuries AD, and it is only within the last 500 years that this practice has become contentious.